Ética evolucionista: a diferença entre altruísmo e moralidade
Resumo
Autores que adotam a abordagem da ética evolucionista para explicar a conformação da psicologia humana costumam confundir altruísmo e moralidade, ignorando que a existência de comportamentos cooperativos e de punições contra indivíduos egoístas não depende da existência de juízos morais. No presente artigo, apresento argumentos extraídos de discussões entre cognitivistas e não-cognitivistas e resultados de estudos na área da Psicologia moral a fim de esclarecer a importância de distinguir os dois conceitos mencionados. Concluo que a compreensão das diferenças entre altruísmo e moralidade conduz à identificação das diversas capacidades intelectuais envolvidas nos julgamentos morais e é essencial para o projeto de averiguar se a capacidade para julgar moralmente é uma adaptação biológica.Downloads
Referências
AYALA, F. J. Colloquium paper: the difference of being human: morality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, PMID: 20445091, v. 107 Suppl, p. 9015–9022, 2010.
AYER, A. J. Language, Truth and Logic. 2. ed. Dover Publications Inc., 2002.
BAKER, L. R. Naturalism and the First-Person Perspective. 1. ed. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.
BARON-COHEN, S.; LESLIE, A. M.; FRITH, U. Does the autistic child have a ‘theory of mind’ ? Cognition, v. 21, n. 1, p. 37–46, out. 1985.
BARTHOLOW, B. D.; DICKTER, C. L.; SESTIR, M. A. Stereotype activation and control of race bias: cognitive control of inhibition and its impairment by alcohol. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, PMID: 16536651, v. 90, n. 2, p. 272–287, fev. 2006.
CARNAP, R. Philosophy and Logical Syntax. New York: Ams Pr Inc, 1979.
CUSHMAN, F.; YOUNG, L.; GREENE, J. D. Multi-system moral psychology. In: DORIS, J. M. (Org.). The handbook of moral psychology. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2010. p. 47–71.
CUSHMAN, F.; YOUNG, L.; HAUSER, M. The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: testing three principles of harm. Psychological Science, PMID: 17201791, v. 17, n. 12, p. 1082–1089, dez. 2006.
DAMASIO, A. R. Self Comes to Mind: Constructing the Conscious Brain. Pantheon Books, 2010.
DARWIN, C. The descent of man. Overland Park: Digireads.com, 2004.
DE WAAL, F. Good natured: The origins of right and wrong in humans and other animals. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996.
DENNETT, D. C. The Intentional Stance. Rev. ed. Cambridge, Mass.: A Bradford Book, 1989.
DWYER, S. Moral dumbfounding and the linguistic analogy: Methodological implications for the study of moral judgment. Mind and Language, v. 24, n. 3, p. 274–296, 2009.
FESSLER, D. M. T. et al. Disgust sensitivity and meat consumption: A test of an emotivist account of moral vegetarianism. Appetite, PMID: 12880619, v. 41, n. 1, p. 31–41, 2003.
FITCH, W. T. The Evolution of Language. 1. ed. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
FITZPATRICK, W. Morality and Evolutionary Biology. In: ZALTA, E. N. (Org.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Spring 2016 ed. Disponível em: <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/morality-biology/>. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2016.
GAZZANIGA, M. S. The Social Brain: Discovering the Networks of the Mind. 1. ed. New York: Basic Books, 1985.
GEACH, P. T. Assertion. Philosophical Review, v. 74, n. 4, p. 449–465, 1965.
GIBBARD, A. Thinking How to Live. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 2003.
GREENE, J. D. et al. Cognitive Load Selectively Interferes with Utilitarian Moral Judgment. Cognition, PMID: 18158145, v. 107, n. 3, p. 1144–1154, jun. 2008.
GREENE, J. D. et al. The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, PMID: 15473975, v. 44, n. 2, p. 389–400, 14 out. 2004.
GREENE, J.; HAIDT, J. How (and where) does moral judgment work? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, PMID: 12475712, v. 6, n. 12, p. 517–523, 1 dez. 2002.
GREENWALD, A. G.; MCGHEE, D. E.; SCHWARTZ, J. L. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, PMID: 9654756, v. 74, n. 6, p. 1464–1480, jun. 1998.
HAIDT, J. Moral Psychology and the Law: How Intuitions Drive Reasoning, Judgment, and the Search for Evidence. Alabama Law Review, v. 64, p. 867–903, 2013.
HAIDT, J. The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, PMID: 11212634, v. 108, n. 4, p. 814–834, 2001.
HAIDT, J. The righteous mind: why good people are divided by politics and religion. 1. ed. New York: Pantheon Books, 2012.
HAIDT, J.; JOSEPH, C. The Moral Mind: How Five Sets of Innate Intuitions Guide the Development of Many Culture-Specific Virtues, and Perhaps Even Modules. In: CARRUTHERS, P.; LAURENCE, S.; STICH, S. (Org.). The Innate Mind. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008. v. 3.
HAIDT, J.; KESEBIR, S. Morality. In: FISKE, S.; GILBERT, D.; LINDZEY, G. (Org.). . Handbook of Social Psychology. 5. ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2010. p. 797–832.
HAIDT, J.; KOLLER, S. H.; DIAS, M. G. Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, PMID: 8229648, v. 65, n. 4, p. 613–628, out. 1993.
HARE, R. M. The Language of Morals. London; New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.
HAUSER, M.; YOUNG, L.; CUSHMAN, F. Reviving Rawls’ linguistic analogy: Operative principles and the causal structure of moral actions. In: SINNOTT-ARMSTRONG, W. (Org.). Moral Psychology, The Cognitive Science of Morality: Intuition and Diversity. Cambridge: MIT press, 2008. v. 2. p. 107–143.
JOYCE, R. Evolution and Moral Naturalism. In: CLARK, K. J. (Org.). The Blackwell Companion to Naturalism. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2016. p. 369–385. Disponível em: <http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781118657775.ch26/summary>. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2016.
JOYCE, R. Moral Anti-Realism. In: ZALTA, E. N. (Org.). . The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Fall 2015 ed. Disponível em: <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2015/entries/moral-anti-realism/>. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2016.
JOYCE, R. The evolution of morality. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2006.
JOYCE, R. The many moral nativisms. In: STERELNY, K. et al. (Org.). Cooperation and its Evolution. MIT press, 2013.
JOYCE, R. The origins of moral judgment. Behaviour, v. 151, n. 2–3, p. 261–278, 2014.
KAHNEMAN, D. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar Straus Giroux, 2013.
KELLY, D.; MACHERY, E.; MALLON, R. Race and Racial Cognition. In: DORIS, J. M. (Org.). . The Moral Psychology Handbook. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.
KORSGAARD, C. Morality and the distinctiveness of human action. In: MACEDO, S.; OBER, J. (Org.). Primates and philosophers: How morality evolved. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006. p. 98–119.
KORSGAARD, C. M. The Constitution of Agency: Essays on Practical Reason and Moral Psychology. 1. ed. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.
LOMBROZO, T. The Role of Moral Commitments in Moral Judgment. Cognitive Science, v. 33, n. 2, p. 273–286, 1 mar. 2009.
LUO, Q. et al. The neural basis of implicit moral attitude—an IAT study using event-related fMRI. NeuroImage, PMID: 16418007, v. 30, n. 4, p. 1449–1457, 1 maio 2006.
MACKIE, J. L. Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. New ed. Penguin, 1990.
MALLON, R.; NICHOLS, S. Dual Processes and Moral Rules. Emotion Review, v. 3, n. 3, p. 284–285, 7 jan. 2011.
MALLON, R.; NICHOLS, S. Rules. In: DORIS, J. M. (Org.). The Moral Psychology Handbook. 1. ed. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.
MAMELI, M. Meat made us moral: a hypothesis on the nature and evolution of moral judgment. Biology & Philosophy, v. 28, n. 6, p. 903–931, 18 set. 2013.
MONAHAN, J. L.; MURPHY, S. T.; ZAJONC, R. B. Subliminal mere exposure: specific, general, and diffuse effects. Psychological Science, PMID: 11202490, v. 11, n. 6, p. 462–466, nov. 2000.
NICHOLS, S. Sentimentalism naturalized. In: SINNOTT-ARMSTRONG, W. (Org.). Moral Psychology, The Cognitive Science of Morality: Intuition and Diversity. Cambridge: MIT press, 2008. v. 2. p. 255–274.
NOSEK, B. A.; GREENWALD, A. G.; BANAJI, M. R. The Implicit Association Test at Age 7: A Methodological and Conceptual Review. Social psychology and the unconscious: The automaticity of higher mental processes. Frontiers of social psychology. New York, NY, US: Psychology Press, 2007. p. 265–292.
PENNINGTON, J.; SCHLENKER, B. R. Accountability for Consequential Decisions: Justifying Ethical Judgments to Audiences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, v. 25, n. 9, p. 1067–1081, 1 set. 1999.
PIZARRO, D. A.; BLOOM, P. The intelligence of the moral intuitions: comment on Haidt (2001). Psychological Review, PMID: 12529062, v. 110, n. 1, p. 193–198, jan. 2003.
PIZARRO, D. A.; UHLMANN, E.; BLOOM, P. Causal deviance and the attribution of moral responsibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, v. 39, n. 6, p. 653–660, 2003.
PRINZ, J. Beyond human nature: how culture and experience shape our lives. Allen Lane, an imprint of Penguin Books, 2012.
PRINZ, J. Where Do Morals Come From?–A Plea for a Cultural Approach. In: CHRISTEN, M. et al. (Org.). Empirically Informed Ethics: morality between facts and norms. Berlin: Springer, 2013.
RICHESON, J. A. et al. An fMRI investigation of the impact of interracial contact on executive function. Nature Neuroscience, v. 6, n. 12, p. 1323–1328, dez. 2003.
RICHESON, J. A.; SHELTON, J. N. When Prejudice Does Not Pay Effects of Interracial Contact on Executive Function. Psychological Science, PMID: 12741756, v. 14, n. 3, p. 287–290, 1 maio 2003.
RITCHIE, J. Understanding naturalism. Stocksfield: Acumen Pub. Ltd., 2008.
SAYRE-MCCORD, G. Metaethics. In: ZALTA, E. N. (Org.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Summer 2014 ed. Disponível em: <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2014/entries/metaethics/>. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2016.
SCHNALL, S. et al. Disgust as embodied moral judgment. Personality and social psychology bulletin, PMID: 18505801, v. 34, n. 8, p. 1096–1109, 2008.
SINCLAIR, S. et al. Social tuning of automatic racial attitudes: the role of affiliative motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, PMID: 16287420, v. 89, n. 4, p. 583–592, out. 2005.
SINNOTT-ARMSTRONG, W.; YOUNG, L.; CUSHMAN, F. Moral intuitions as heuristics. In: DORIS, J. M. (Org.). The moral psychology handbook. 1. ed. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press, 2010. p. 246–272.
SKORUPSKI, J. The Definition of Morality. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, v. 35, p. 121–144, set. 1993.
STERELNY, K. Moral nativism: A sceptical response. Mind & Language, v. 25, n. 3, p. 279–297, 2010.
STERELNY, K. The evolved apprentice: how evolution made humans unique. MIT Press, 2012.
WAHL, K. Wie kommt die Moral in den Kopf?: Von der Werteerziehung zur Persönlichkeitsförderung. Berlin: Springer Spektrum, 2014.
WARNEKEN, F.; TOMASELLO, M. Altruistic Helping in Human Infants and Young Chimpanzees. Science, PMID: 16513986, v. 311, n. 5765, p. 1301–1303, 3 mar. 2006.
WHEATLEY, T.; HAIDT, J. Hypnotic disgust makes moral judgments more severe. Psychological Science, PMID: 16181440, v. 16, n. 10, p. 780–784, 2005.
WIMMER, H.; PERNER, J. Beliefs about beliefs: representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, PMID: 6681741, v. 13, n. 1, p. 103–128, jan. 1983.
ZAJONC, R. B. Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, v. 35, n. 2, p. 151–175, 1980.
(1) Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
(2) Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
(3) Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre)
