The Cultural Heritage as a Resource in Conflict Resolution – Possibilities and challenges
Resumo
The goal of this article is to present some of the ways in which the cultural heritage can be used in conflict resolution and to which results, as well as to outline challenges. My method has been to read previous research concerning how the cultural heritage can be used in conflict resolution. I have also read the reports and articles available from the projects that I have deemed relevant. I have studied research projects, global organizations as well as smaller and more regional NGOs. This study shows that there are many ways in which the cultural heritage can be used as a resource in conflict resolution. However, for it to work one need also be aware of the various ways in which it can be misused. If those for whom a project is created are considered passive targets of a particular message concerning the past, the risk of losing control of that message will increase. The various meanings of the past as well as the people targeted, are not static but constantly in movement. I therefore argue that a process- oriented approach, preferably through dialogue and participation, would be a way to avoid a static presentation. This method could try to present history from as many perspectives as possible and begin with a focus on the local places and consider the inherently intangible aspects of heritage, to make it relatable, and from there highlight wider issues. Furthermore, the people planning it must be ready to get their own opinions about the heritage challenged by different perceptions, and in so doing, the inherently dissonant aspects of heritage should be seen as a resource rather than as a disturbance. Resumo: O objetivo deste artigo é apresentar algumas das formas pelas quais o patrimônio cultural pode ser utilizado na resolução de conflitos e para quais resultados, bem como delinear desafios. Meu método tem sido ler pesquisas anteriores sobre como o patrimônio cultural pode ser usado na resolução de conflitos. Também li os relatórios e artigos disponíveis sobre os projetos que considerei relevantes. Tenho estudado projetos de pesquisa, organizações globais, bem como ONGs menores e mais regionais. Este estudo mostra que existem muitas maneiras pelas quais o patrimônio cultural pode ser usado como um recurso na resolução de conflitos. No entanto, para que funcione, é preciso estar ciente das várias maneiras pelas quais pode ser mal utilizado. Se aqueles para os quais um projeto é criado forem considerados alvos passivos de uma mensagem específica sobre o passado, o risco de perder o controle dessa mensagem aumentará. Os vários significados do passado, assim como as pessoas visadas, não são estáticos, mas em constante movimento. Portanto, argumento que uma abordagem orientada para o processo, de preferência por meio do diálogo e da participação, seria uma forma de evitar uma apresentação estática. Este método pode tentar apresentar a história de tantas perspectivas quanto possível e começar a considerar os aspectos inerentemente intangíveis do patrimônio com enfo que local para torná-los relacionáveis e, a partir daí, destacar questões mais amplas. Além disso, as pessoas que planejam o método devem estar prontas para obter suas próprias opiniões sobre o patrimônio desafiadas por diferentes percepções e, ao fazê-lo, os aspectos inerentemente dissonantes do patrimônio devem ser vistos como um recurso e não como uma perturbação.Downloads
Referências
ANDERSON, B. Den föreställda gemenskapen: reflexioner kring nationalismens ursprung och spridning. Göteborg: Daidalos. 1991.
APPADURAI, A. Modernity at large: cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis, University of Min-nesota Press. 1996.
ARONSSON, P. Explaining National Museums: Exploring comparative approaches to the study of national museums. In: Knell, Simon J. (ed.) National museums: new studies from around the world. Abingdon : Routledge. Pp. 29-54. 2011.
ASHWORTH, G. J., B. J. GRAHAM & J. E. TUNBRIDGE, J. E. Pluralising pasts: heritage, identity and place in multicultural societies. London: Pluto Press. 2007.
BAKKER, K., A., & L. MÜLLER. Intangible Heritage and Community Identity in Post-Apartheid South Africa. Museum International. No. 245–246 (Vol. 62, No. 1–2, 2010). Pp. 48-56. 2010.
BALIBAR, É. Nationsformen: Historia och ideology. In: Étiene B. & Immanuel W. (red.) Ras, Nation, KLASS, Boförlaget Daidalos AB, Uddevalla. 2002.
BOYM, S. The future of nostalgia. New York, Basic Books. 2001.
BRUBAKER, R. Ethnicity without groups. Cambridge, Harvard University Press. 2004.
BUCHLI, V. & G. LUCAS. Archaeologies of the Contemporary Past. Routledge. 2001.
FILIPPUCCI, P. Archaeology and the anthropology of memory: Takes on the recent past. In: Duncan, G. & Thomas, Y. (eds.) Archaeology and anthropology: understanding similarities, exploring differences. Oxford: Oxbow Books Ltd. Pp. 69-83. 2012.
FREDHEIM, H. Decoupling ’Open’ and ’Ethical’ Archaeologies: Rethinking Deficits and Expertise for Ethical Public Participation in Archaeology and Heritage. Norwegian Archaeological Review. (Online first). 2020.
GUSTAFSSON, B. The Meaning of Places through Stories: A Pedagogical Perspective. In: GUSTAFSSON, B., HOLTORF, C., WESTERGREN, E.(eds.) Museum International Volume 63, Issue 1-2. Pp. 63-69. 2011.
GUSTAFSSON, A. & H. KARLSSON. A Spectre is Haunting Swedish Archaeology – The Spectre of Politics. Archaeology, Cultural Heritage and the Present Political Situation in Sweden. Current Swedish Ar-chaeology 19. Pp. 11-36. 2011.
HARRISON, R. Beyond “Natural” and “Cultural” Heritage: Toward an Ontological Politics of Her-itage in the Age of Anthropocene. Heritage & Society 8 (1). Pp. 24-42. 2015.
HARRISON, R. & D. ROSE. Intangible Heritage. In: R. Harrion. (ed.) Understanding Heritage and Memory. Edited byManchester: Manchester University Press. Pp. 238-276. 2010.
HARRISON, R., C. DESILVEY, C. HOLTORF, S. MACDONALD, N. BARTOLINI, E. BREITHOFF, H. FREDHEIM, A. LYONS, S. MAY, J. MORGAN, & S. PENROSE. Heritage Futures Comparative Approaches to Natural and Cultural Heritage Practices. UCL Press. 2020.
HASTRUP, K. Kultur- Den flexibla gemenskapen. Lund: Studentlitteratur. 2010.
HERSCHER, A. Violence taking place: the architecture of the Kosovo conflict. California, Stanford University Press. 2010.
HOLTORF, C. The Changing Contribution of Cultural Heritage to Society. In: B. Gustafsson, C. 2011. HOLTORF, E. WESTERGREN. (eds.) Museum International Volume 63, Issue 1-2. Pp. 8-16. 2011.
HOLTORF, C. Cultural heritage beyond culturalism. Published online at “Heritage for transformation”: https://heritagefortransformation.wordpress.com/2017/11/29/cultural-heritage-beyond-culturalism/ 2017.
HOLTORF, C. Embracing change: how cultural resilience is increased through cultural heritage. World Archaeology 50 (4). Pp. 639-650. 2018.
HOLTORF, C. AND A. HÖGBERG. Heritage Futures and the future of heritage. Counterpoint: Essays in Ar-chaeology and Heritage Studies in Honour of Professor Kristian Kristiansen. Edited by S. Bergerbrant and S. Sabati-ni. BAR Int. Ser. 2508. Archaeopress, Oxford. Pp. 739-746. 2013.
HYLLAND-ERIKSEN, T. Rötter och fötter : Identitet i en föränderlig tid. Nya Doxa. 2004.
HÖGBERG, A. To renegotiate heritage and citizenship beyond essentialism. Archaeological Dialogues 23 (1). Pp. 39-48. 2016.
HÖGBERG, A., C. HOLTORF., S. MAY AND G. WOLLENTZ. No future in archaeological heritage manage-ment? World archaeology 49 (5). Pp. 639-647. 2017.
KIDDEY, R. I’ll Tell You What I Want, What I Really, Really Want! Open Archaeology that Is Collaborative, Participatory, Public, and Feminist. Norwegian Archaeological Review. 2020.
KISIĆ, V. Governing Heritage Dissonance: Promises and Realities of Selected Cultural Policies. European Cultural Foundation. 2016.
KUTMA, K. Contested Memory and Re-configured Master Narratives: Museum Institution in Totalitarian Regimes. In: POULOT, P., GUIRAL, J. M. L., & BODENSTEIN, F. (eds.). National Museums and the Negotiation of Difficult Pasts. EuNaMus Report No. 8. Published by Link̈ping University Electronic Press. Pp. 79-90. 2012.
KURTOVIĆ, L. & A. HROMADŽIĆ. Cannibal states, empty bellies: Protest, history and political imagination in post-Dayton Bosnia. Critique of Anthropology 37(3). Pp. 262-296. 2017.
KÄLVEMARK, T. Cultural Heritage for Peace and Reconciliation: An evaluation of Cultural Heritage without Borders (ChwB). Unpublished report available at http://chwb.org 2007.
LEVIN, M. Community Engagement with Heritage. In: SVANBERG, F. (ed.). The Museum as Forum and Actor. The Museum of National Antiquities, Stockholm. Pp. 61-76. 2010.
LJUNGMAN, C. & J. TABOROFF. Evaluation of Cultural Heritage without Borders (2008–2011). Unpublished report available at http://chwb.org 2011.
MAKAŠ, E. Representing Competing Identities: Building and Rebuilding in Postwar Mostar, Bosnia- Hercegovina. Unpublished PhD thesis, Cornell University. 2007.
MAKSIMOVIĆ, M. Unattainable past, unsatisfying present – Yugonostalgia: an omen of a better future? Nationalities Papers 45(6). Pp. 1066-1081. 2017.
MAY, S. Heritage, endangerment and participation: alternative futures in the Lake District. International Journal of Heritage Studies 26 (1). Pp. 71-86. 2020.
NIKLASSON, E. & HØLLELAND, H. The Scandinavian far-right and the new politicisation of heritage. Journal of Social Archaeology 18 (2). Pp. 121–148. 2018.
NORA, P. Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Mémoire. Memory and Counter Memory 26, 7– 67 24. 1989.
NORA, P. Rethinking France. Les Lieux de Mémoire. Volume 1. The State. The University of Chicago Press. 2001.
PALMBERGER, M. Nostalgia matters: nostalgia for Yugoslavia as potential vision for a better future. Sociologija, Vol. L (2008) (4). Pp. 355-370. 2008.
PETROVIĆ, T. The territory of the former Yugoslavia in the “mental maps” of former Yugoslavs: Nostalgia for space. Sprawy Narodowościowe 31. Pp. 263-273. 2007.
POULIOS, I. Is Every Heritage Site a ‘Living’ One? Linking Conservation to Communities’ Associa-tion with Sites. The Historic Environment 2 (2). Pp. 144-156. 2011.
RASPUDIĆ, N. The Monument of Bruce Lee – Yes and Why? Unpublished speech held November 5, 2004.
STENGÅRD, M. & LEGNER, M. Funder and facilitator: Swedish development aid aimed at cultural heritage in Bosnia and Herzegovina 1995–2008. International Journal of Cultural Policy. DOI: 10.1080/10286632.2019.1621302 [online first] 2019.
GONZÁLEZ-RUIBAL, A. Time to Destroy. An Archaeology of Supermodernity. Current Anthropology 49 (2). Pp. 247-279. 2008.
GONZÁLEZ-RUIBAL, A. Excavating Memory, Burying History. Lessons from the Spanish Civil War. Between Memory Sites and Memory Networks New Archaeological and Historical Perspectives, Berlin, Reihe: Berlin Studies of the Ancient World. Vol. 45. Pp. 279-302. 2017.
GONZÁLEZ-RUIBAL, A. An Archaeology of the Contemporary Era: The Age of Destruction. Routledge. 2020.
GONZÁLEZ-RUIBAL, A., P.A. GONZÁLEZ AND F. CRIADO-BOADO. Against reactionary populism: towards a new public archaeology. Antiquity 92 (362). Pp. 507–515. 2018.
SEBEK, N. How Turkish is your Coffee. The SEE Joint History Project. In: Svanberg, F. (ed.). The Museum as Forum and Actor. The Museum of National Antiquities, Stockholm. Pp. 115-124. 2010.
ŠEVČENKǑ, L. Sites of Conscience: new approaches to conflicted memory. Museum International. No. 245–246 (Vol. 62, No. 1–2, 2010). Pp. 20-25. 2010.
ŠEVČENKǑ, L. Sites of Conscience: Heritage of and for Human Rights. In: Anheier, H. & Isar, Y. R. (ed.) Heritage, Memory and Identity. Pp. 114-123. 2011.
SMITH, L. Uses of heritage. New York, Routledge. 2006.
SMITH, L. & CAMPBELL, G. ‘Nostalgia for the future’: memory, nostalgia and the politics of class. International Journal of Heritage Studies 23(7). Pp. 612-627. 2017.
SMITH, L. & WATERTON, E. There is no such thing as heritage. Taking Archaeology out of Heritage, edited by L. Smith and E. Waterton. Pp. 10-27. Cambridge, Cambridge Scholars Publishing. 2009.
STARZMANN, M. T. & ROBY, J. R.. Excavating Memory. Sites of remembering and forgetting. Florida, University Press of Florida. 2016.
TROUILLOT, M.R. Silencing the past: power and the production of history. Boston, Mass., Beacon Press. 1995.
TUNBRIDGE, J. E. & ASHWORTH, G. J. Dissonant heritage: the management of the past as a resource in conflict. Wiley, Chichester. 1996.
WERTSCH, J., BILLINGSLEY, D. M. The Role of Narratives in Commemoration: Remembering as Mediated Action. In: Anheier, H. & Isar, Y. R. (eds.) Heritage, Memory and Identity. Pp. 25-38. 2011.
VIEJO-ROSE, D. Destruction and Reconstruction of Heritage: Impacts on Memory and Identity. In: Anheier, H. & Isar, Y. R. (eds.) Heritage, Memory and Identity. Pp. 53-69. 2011a.
VIEJO-ROSE, D. Reconstructing Spain: cultural heritage and memory after Civil War. Brighton: Sussex Academic. 2011b.
WESTERGREN, E. & HUNNER, J. Engaging the Present through the Past. In: GUSTAFSSON, B., HOLTORF, C., WESTERGREN, E. (eds.) Museum International Volume 63, Issue 1-2. Pp. 119-129. 2011.
WESTERGREN, E. & WOLLENTZ, G. (eds). The Time Travel Method - In the Service of Society and its Development. Kalmar, Kalmar County Museum. 2018.
WILLIAMS, P. Treading Difficult Ground: The Effort to Establish Russia’s First National Gulag Museum. In: Poulot, P., Guiral, J. M. L., & Bodenstein, F. (eds.). National Museums and the Negotiation of Difficult Pasts. EuNaMus Report No. 8. Published by Link̈ping University Electronic Press. Pp. 111-121. 2012.
WING, L. Dealing with the Past: shared and contested narratives in ‘post-conflict’ Northern Ireland. Museum International. No. 245–246 (Vol. 62, No. 1–2, 2010). Pp. 31-36. 2010.
WOLLENTZ, G. The Cultural Heritage as a Resource in Conflict Resolution: An Overview of the Field. Kalmar County Museum. http://bridgingages.com/site/assets/files/1516/cultural_heritage_in_conflict_resolution.pdf [02 11 2020]. 2014.
WOLLENTZ, G. Making a home in Mostar: Heritage and the Temporalities of Belonging. International Journal of Heritage Studies 23 (10). Pp. 928-945. 2017a.
WOLLENTZ, G. Prehistoric violence as difficult heritage: Sandby borg - a place of avoidance and belonging. Current Swedish Archaeology 25. Pp. 199-226. 2017b.
WOLLENTZ, G. Conflicted memorials and the need to look forward. The interplay between remembering and forgetting in Mostar and on the Kosovo Field. In: M. L. S. Sørensen, D. Viejo-Rosé and P. Filippucci. (eds.) Memorials in the Aftermath of Armed Conflict: From History to Heritage. Palgrave Macmillan. Pp. 159-182. 2019.
WOLLENTZ, G. Landscapes of Difficult Heritage. Palgrave Macmillan. 2020.
WOLLENTZ, G., M. BARIŠIĆ AND N. SAMMAR. Youth Activism and Dignity in Post-war Mostar, Envisioning a Shared Future through Heritage. Challenging the Representation of Ethnically Divided CITIES: PERSPECTIVES FROM MOSTAR. SPACE AND POLITY 23 (2). PP. 197-215. 2019.
WOLLENTZ, G., S. MAY, C. HOLTORF AND A. HÖGBERG. Toxic Heritage: Uncertain and Unsafe. Heritage Futures. Comparative Approaches to Natural and Cultural Heritage Practices In: Harrison, R., DeSilvey, C., Holfort, C., Macdonald, S., Bartolini, N., Breithoff, E., Fredheim, H., Lyons, A., May, S., Morgan, J., Penrose, S., with contributions by Högberg, A., and Wollentz, G. (eds.). UCL Press. Pp. 294-312. 2020.
WOLLENTZ, G. & H. KUHLEFELT. Heritage as a process of connecting - pluralism and diversity in Nordic and Baltic museums. International Journal of Heritage Studies. (online first). 2020.
Internet sources
Healing Through Remembering. www.healingthroughremembering.org. Accessed 02/11 2020.
NCK. http://nckultur.org/projekt/heritage-identity-and-social-cohesion/. Accessed 02/11 2020.
Copyright (c) 2020 Gustav Wollentz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Os Cadernos do LEPAARQ publicam artigos em português, espanhol, italiano, francês e inglês, sem cobrança de nenhum tipo de taxa em nenhum momento, respeitando a naturalidade e o estilo dos autores. As provas finais serão enviadas aos autores, para sua conferência antes da publicação. O Conselho Editorial não se responsabiliza por opiniões emitidas pelos autores dos trabalhos publicados. O periódico Cadernos do LEPAARQ oferece acesso livre imediato ao seu conteúdo, seguindo o princípio de que disponibilizar gratuitamente o conhecimento científico ao público proporciona maior democratização mundial do conhecimento. Os textos publicados poderão ser depositados imediatamente pelos autores em suas páginas pessoais, redes sociais e repositórios de textos.Nesse sentido, o periódico não tem fins lucrativos, de modo que os direitos autorais dos artigos publicados pertencerão aos respectivos autores e estes não receberão nenhuma forma de remuneração. Dessa forma, ao enviar o artigo, o autor do mesmo estará automaticamente aceitando esta condição. A reimpressão, total ou parcial, dos trabalhos publicados deve ser apenas informada pelos seus respectivos autores ao conselho editorial do periódico. OBS. Cabe(m) ao(s) autor(es) as devidas autorizações de uso de imagens com direito autoral protegido (Lei nº 9610, de 19 de fevereiro de 1998), que se realizará com o aceite no ato do preenchimento da ficha de inscrição via web.
