Dardo ou flecha? Testes e reflexões sobre a tecnologia de uso de pontas de projétil no Sudeste e Sul do Brasil durante a pré-história
Resumo
Resumo: Conhecidas popularmente como “pontas de flecha”, as pontas de projétil associadas à Tradição Umbu no sul e sudeste brasileiros carecem de investigação acerca do modo como foram utilizadas. Há variações importantes de tamanho entre pontas de flecha e pontas de dardo, dadas as diferenças tecnológicas associadas aos meios de propulsão utilizados. Este trabalho visa explorar de maneira preliminar, através da técnica proposta por Shott (1997), a questão sobre o uso de dardos e flechas no sudeste e sul do Brasil durante a pré-história. Foram analisadas pontas de oito sítios do sul e sudeste do Brasil, datados desde o Pleistoceno tardio até o Holoceno final. Pelo menos um conjunto de pontas, datado do início do Holoceno, apresentou uma proporção relativamente alta de pontas classificadas com “flecha”, indicando a presença de pontas que potencialmente poderiam ser usadas nesse sistema. Abstract: Popularly known as "arrowheads", the projectile points associated with the Umbu Tradition in southern and southeastern Brazil have been lacking research about how they have been used. There are important variations in size between arrowheads and dart points, given the differences in their associated technological propulsions. Using the technique proposed by Shott (1997), this work aims, in a preliminary way, to better understand the use of darts and arrows in southeastern and southern Brazil during prehistory. The sample comprised points from eight sites from southern and southeastern Brazil, dating from the late Pleistocene to the late Holocene. At least one set of points, dated from the early Holocene, presented quite high proportion of points that could be considered as arrowheads, indicating the presence of points that could be potentially used as arrows.Referências
AHLER, S. A. Projectile point form and function at Rodgers rockshelter. Missouri: Missouri Archaeological Society, 1971.
AIKENS, C M. The Far West. IN: JENNINGS, J. D. Ancient Native Americans. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company, 1978. p. 131-181.
AMES, K. M.; FULD, K. A.; DAVIS, S. Dart and arrow points on the Columbia Plateau of Western North America. American Antiquity, v. 75, p. 287-325, 2010.
ANDREFSKY JR, W. Raw-material availability and the organization of technology. American Antiquity, v. 59, p. 21-34, 1994.
AOYAMA, K. Classic Maya warfare and weapons: spear, dart, and arrow points of Aguateca and Copan. Ancient Mesoamerica, v. 16, p. 291-304, 2005.
ARRIAZA, B. Chinchorro bioarchaeology: chronology and mummy seriation. Latin American Antiquity, v. 6, p. 35-55, 1995.
BACHECHI, L.; FABBRI, P.-F.; MALLEGNI, F. An arrow-caused lesion in a Late Upper Paleolithic human pelvis. Current Anthropology, v. 38, p. 135-140, 1997.
BALDUS, H. The Tapirapé: a Tupi tribe of Central Brazil. Revista do Arquivo Municipal, v. 96-105, 107-124, 127, 1970.
BARCELOS NETO, A. Processo criativo e apreciação estética no grafismo Wauja. Cadernos de Campo, v. 13, p. 87-108, 2004.
BARTON, H.; PIPER, P. J.; RABETT, R.; REEDS, I. Composite hunting technologies from the Terminal Pleistocene and Early Holocene, Niah Cave, Borneo. Journal of Archaeological Science, v. 36, p. 1708-1714, 2009.
BERGMAN, C. A.; McEWEN, E.; MILLER, R. Experimental archery: projectile velocities and comparison of bow performances. Antiquity, v. 62, p. 658-670, 1988.
BIRD, J. B. Excavations in Northern Chile. Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History, v. 27, 1943.
BIRD, J. B. The cultural sequence of the North Chilean coast. In: STEWARD, J. H. Handbook of South American Indians. Washington: United States Government Printing Office, 1946. v. 2, p. 587-594.
BITTMANN, B.; MUNIZAGA, J. R. El arco en América: evidencia temprana y directa de la Cultura Chinchorro (norte de Chile). Indiana, v. 5, p. 229-251, 1979.
BLITZ, J. Adoption of the bow in prehistoric North America. North American Archaeologist, v. 9, p. 123-145, 1988.
BORRERO, L. A. The Theory of evolution, other theories, and the process of human colonization of America. Evolution: Education and Outreach, v. 4, p. 218-222, 2011.
BRADBURY, A. P. The bow and arrow in the Eastern Woodlands: evidence for an Archaic origin. North American Archaeologist, v. 18, p. 207-233, 1997.
BRANCH, J. F. The Hunting of the Buffalo. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1962.
BROCHADO, J. P.; SCHMITZ, P. I. Aleros y cuevas com petroglifos e industria lítica de la escarpa del Planalto Meridional en Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Anales de Arqueologia y Etnologia (Mendoza), v. XXVII-XXVIII, p. 39-66, 1972-1973.
BROWNE, J. Antiquity of the bow. American Antiquity, v. 3, p. 358-359, 1938.
BRUECHERT, L. W. Mummy burial of the Muisca Empire. The Atlatl, v. 11, 1998.
CAPITAN, L. Une arme des anciens Péruviens: l'estolica; son identification par l'iconographie céramique. Comptesrendus des Séances de l'Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres, 55e année, p. 407-410, 1911.
CASANOVA, E. Uma estolica de La Puna Jujeña. Relaciones de la Sociedad Argentina de Antropología, v. 4, p. 115-132, 1944.
CATTELAIN, P. Hunting during the Upper Paleolithic: bow, spearthrower, or both? In: KNECHT, H. Projectile technology. New York: Plenum, 1997. p. 213-240.
CHARLIN, J.; GONZÁLEZ-JOSÉ, R. Size and shape variation in Late Holocene projectile points of Southern Patagonia: a geometric morphometric study. American Antiquity, v. 77, p. 221-242, 2012.
CHATTERS, J. C.; CAMPBELL, S. K.; SMITH, G. D.; MINTHORN JR, P. E. Bison procurement in the Far West: a 2,100-year-old kill site on the Columbia Plateau. American Antiquity, v. 60, p. 751-763, 1995.
CHÊNG TÊ-K'UN 鄭德坤. The prehistory of China. T'oung Pao, p. 1-11, 1974.
CHMYZ, I.; SGANZERLA, E. M.; VOLCOV, J. E.; BORA, E.; CECCON, R. S. A arqueologia da área da LT 750kV Ivaiporã-Itaberá III, Paraná - São Paulo. Arqueologia (Revista do CEPA), v. 5, p. 1-305, 2008.
CHRISTENSON, A. L. Projectile point size and projectile aerodynamics: an exploratory study. Plains Anthropologist, v. 31, p. 109-128, 1986.
CHURCHILL, S. E. Weapon technology, prey size selection, and hunting methods in modern hunter-gatherers: implications for hunting in the Paleolithic and Mesolithic. In: PETERKIN, G. L.; BRICKER, H. M.; MELLARS, P. Hunting and animal exploitation in the later Paleolithic and Mesolithic of Eurasia. Washington, D.C.: Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, 1993. p. 11-24.
COLLINS, M. B. Lithic technology as a means of processual inference. In: SWANSON, E. H. Lithic technology: making and using stone tools. The Hague: Mouton, 1975.
DE LOBERA, P. M. Crónica del Reino de Chile. Santiago de Chile: Editorial Universitaria, 1970.
DE SOUZA, P. H. Tecnologías de proyectil durante los períodos Arcaico y Formativo en el Loa Superior (Norte de Chile): a partir del análisis de puntas líticas. Chungara (Revista de Antropología Chilena), Volumen Especial: Simposio Perspectivas Teóricas y Metodológicas en los Estudios Líticos, p. 61-76, 2004.
DIAS, A. S. Hunter-gatherer occupation of South Brazilian Atlantic Forest: paleoenvironment and archaeology. Quaternary International, v. 256, p. 12-18, 2012.
DICKSON, D. B. The atlatl assessed a review of recent anthropological approaches to prehistoric North American weaponry. Bulletin of the Texas Archaeological Society, v. 56, p. 1-36, 1985.
EHREINREICH, P. Contribuições para a etnologia do Brasil. Revista do Museu Paulista, Nova Série, v. 2, p. 7-135, 1949.
ERLANDSON, J. M., WATTS, J. L., JEW, N. P. Darts, arrows, and archaeologists: distinguishing dart and arrow points in the archaeological record. American Antiquity, v. 79, p. 162-169, 2014.
ERWIN, J. C.; HOLLY JR, D. H.; HULL, S. H.; RAST, T. L. Form and function of projectile points and the trajectory of Newfoundland prehistory. Canadian Journal of Archaeology, v. 29, p. 46-67, 2005.
EVANS, O. F. Probable use of stone projectile points. American Antiquity, v. 23, p. 83-84, 1957.
EVANS, O. F. The development of the atlatl and the bow. Bulletin of the Texas Archaeological Society, v. 30, p. 159-162, 1959.
FARMER, M. F. The origins of weapons systems. Current Anthropology, v. 35, p. 679-681, 1994.
FAWCETT Jr, W. B.; KORNFELD, M. Projectile point neck-width variability and chronology on the Plains. Wyoming Contributions to Anthropology, v. 2, p. 66-79, 1980.
FAWCETT, W. B. Chronology and projectile point neck-width: an Idaho example. North American Archaeologist, v. 19, p. 59-85, 1998.
FENENGA, F. The weights of chipped stone points: a clue to their functions. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, v. 9, p. 309-323, 1953.
FERNÁNDEZ DISTEL, A. A. Nuevos hallazgos de estólicas en el borde de la puna jujeña (Argentina), y reactualización del problema según recientes investigaciones en los Andes Meridionales. VII Congreso de Arqueología de Chile Altos Vilches. Talca, 1977.
FLEGENHEIMER, N.; MARTÍNEZ, J. G.; COLOMBO, M. Una experiencia de lanzamiento de puntas cola de pescado. In: BERÓN, M.; LUNA, L.; BONOMO, M.; MONTALVO, C.; ARANDA, C.; CARRERA AIZPITARTE, M. Mamül Mapu: pasado y presente desde la arqueología pampeana. Ayacucho: Editorial Libros del Espinillo, 2010. p. 215-231.
FOCACCI, G. Excavaciones en el cementerio Playa Miller-7 (Arica). Chungara (Revista de Antropología Chilena), v. 3, p. 23-74, 1974.
FOCACCI, G.; CHACÓN, S. Excavaciones arqueológicas en los faldeos del Morro de Arica: sitios Morro 1/6 y 2/2. Chungara (Revista de Antropología Chilena), v. 22, p. 15-62, 1989.
FREIDEL, D. A. The Mesoamerican world. Latin American Research Review, v. 21, p. 231-241, 1986.
GALVÃO, E. O uso do propulsor entre as tribos do Alto Xingu. In: GALVÃO, E. Encontro de Sociedades: Índios e Brancos no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 1979. p. 39-56.
GAMBIER, M.; SACCHERO, P. Excavaciones en los morrillos de Ansilta. Trabajos preliminares. Actas del V Congreso Nacional de Arqueología, La Serena, Chüe, p. 389-395, 1969.
GEIB, P. R. A Basketmaker II wooden tool cache from Lower Glen Canyon. Kiva, v. 55, p. 265-277, 1990.
GREAVES, R. D. Hunting and multifunctional use of bows and arrows: ethnoarchaeology of technological organization among Pumé hunters of Venezuela. In: KNECHT, H. Projectile technology. New York: Plenum, 1997. p. 287-320.
GUNNERSON, D. Tabu and Navajo material culture. El Palacio, v. 64, p. 1-19, 1959.
HALL, R. L. An anthropocentric perspective for Eastern United States prehistory. American Antiquity, v. 42, p. 499-518, 1977.
HAMILTON, T M. Native American bows. Columbia: Missouri Archaeological Society, 1982 (Special Publication n. 5).
HARPER, C.; ANDREFSKY JR., W. Exploring the dart and arrow dilemma: retouch indices as functional determinants. In: ANDREFSKY Jr, W. Lithic technology: measures of production, use and curation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. p. 175-194.
HASSIG, R. War and society in Ancient Mesoamerica. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992.
HAURY, E. W. The stratigraphy and archaeology of Ventana Cave. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1975.
HEIZER, R. F. An inquiry into the status of the Santa Barbara spear-thrower. American Antiquity, v. 4, p. 137-141, 1938.
HILDEBRANDT, W. R.; KING, J. H. Distinguishing between darts and arrows in the archaeological record: implications for technological change in the American West. American Antiquity, v. 77, p. 789-799, 2012.
HILL, M. W. The atlatl or throwing stick: a recent study of atlatls in use with darts of various sizes. Tennessee Archaeologist, v. 4, p. 37-44, 1948.
HILL, W. W. The agricultural and hunting methods of the Navajo Indians. New Haven: Yale University Publications in Anthropology, 1938. v. 18.
HITCHCOCK, R.; BLEED, P. Each according to need and fashion: spear and arrow use among San Hunters of the Kalahari. In: KNECHT, H. Projectile Technology, New York: Plenum Press, 1997. p. 345-370.
HOFFMAN, C. M. Projectile point maintenance and typology: assessment with factor analysis and canonical correlation. In: CARR, C. For concordance in archaeological analysis: bridging data structure, quantitative technique, and theory. Kansas City and Fayetteville: Westport Publishers, 1985. p. 566-612.
HOSTNIG, R. Macusani y Corani, repositorios de arte rupestre milenario en la Cordillera de Carabaya, Puno – Perú. Boletín SIARB, n. 17, p. 17-35, 2003.
HOSTNIG, R. Pinturas rupestres arcaicas de la provincia de Espinar, Cusco. Rupestreweb. Sinus data. Disponível em: <http://www.rupestreweb.info/espinar.html>. Acesso em: 16 jun. 2015.
HUGHES, S. Getting to the point: evolutionary change in prehistoric weaponry. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, v. 1, 345-406, 1998.
HUTCHINGS, W. K.; BRUCHERT, L. W. Spearthrower performance: ethnographic and experimental research. Antiquity, v. 71, p. 890-897, 1997.
KAY, M. Microwear analysis of some Clovis and experimental chipped stone tools. In: ODELL, G. Stone tools: theoretical insights into human prehistory. New York: Plenum Press, 1996. p. 315-344.
KELLAR, J. H. The atlatl in North America. Indiana: Indiana Historical Society, 1955. (Prehistory Research Series, v. 3, p. 280-352).
LANSAC, J. P. Discussion d’un cadre chronologique pour l’utilization du propulseur et de l’arc. 2001. Dissertação (Mestrado) - Université Bordeaux, Bordeaux, 2001.
LATCHAM, R. E. Arqueología de la región atacameña. Santiago: Prensas de la Universidade de Chile, 1938.
LAVALLÉE, D. The first South Americans: the peopling of a continent from the earliest evidence to high culture. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 2000.
LEBLANC, S. A. Modeling warfare in Southwestern prehistory. North American Archaeologist, v. 18, p. 235-276, 1997.
LEBLANC, S. Prehistoric warfare in the American Southwest. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 1999.
LEBLANC, S. Warfare in the American Southwest and Mesoamerica. In: BROWN, M. K.; STANTON, T. W. Ancient Mesoamerican warfare. New York: Altamira Press, 2003. p. 265-286.
LYMAN, R. L.; VANPOOL, T. L.; O’BRIEN, M. J. Variation in North American dart points and arrow points when one or both are present. Journal of Archaeological Science, v. 35, p. 2805-2812, 2008.
LYMAN, R. L.; VANPOOL, T. L.; O’BRIEN, M. J. The diversity of North American projectile-point types, before and after the bow and arrow. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, v. 28, p. 1-13, 2009.
MARRINER, H. A. Dart-thrower use depicted in Colombian rock art. International Newsletter on Rock Art, n. 32, p. 25-28, 2002.
MASCHNER, H.; MASON, O. K. The Bow and Arrow in Northern North America. Evolutionary Anthropology, v. 22, p. 133-138, 2013.
MASSEY, W. C. The survival of the dart-thrower on the peninsula of Baja California. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, v. 17, p. 81-92, 1961.
MAU, C. Experiments with the spear thrower. The New York State Archaeological Association Bulletin, v. 29, p. 1-13, 1963.
MENEZES BASTOS, R. J. The Yawari ritual of the Kamayurá: a Xinguano epic. In: KUSS, M. Music in Latin American and the Caribbean: an encyclopedic history, volume 1, Performing Beliefs: Indigenous peoples of South America, Central America, and Mexico. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2004. p. 77-99.
MÉTRAUX, A. Weapons. In: STEWARD, J. H. Handbook of South American Indians. Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office, 1949. v. 5, p. 229-263.
MILLER, E. T. Pesquisas arqueológicas em abrigos-sob-rocha no Nordeste do Rio Grande do Sul. In: SIMÕES, M. Programa Nacional de Pesquisas Arqueológicas: resultados preliminares do quinto ano (1969-1970). Publicações Avulsas do Museu Paranaense Emílio Goeldi, v. 26, p. 11-24, 1974.
MORRISEY, G. Tools and change: the shift from atlatl to bow on the British Columbia Plateau, British Columbia. 2009. Dissertação (Master of Arts) – Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, 2009.
MUNIZAGA, C. Nota sobre una estólica y una estatuilla antropomorfa supuestamente vinculadas al complejo precerámico de la costa de Arica (Chile). Revista Universitaria (Santiago), v. 49, p. 169-172, 1964.
MUÑOZ, I.; ROCHA, R.; CHACÓN, S. Camarones 15: asentamiento de pescadores correspondiente al periodo Arcaico y Formativo en el extremo norte de Chile. Santiago: Museo Nacional de Historia Natural / Sociedad Chilena de Arqueología, 1991 (Actas del XI Congreso Nacional de Arqueología Chilena, v. II).
MURPHY, R. F.; QUAIN, B. H. The Trumaí indians of Central Brazil. New York: Locust Vally, 1955.
NAKAZAWA, Y.; IWASE, A.; AKAI, F.; IZUHO, M. Human responses to the Younger Dryas in Japan. Quaternary International, v. 242, p. 416-433, 2011.
NAMI, H. G. Paleoamerican artifacts from Cerro Largo, Northeastern Uruguay. PaleoAmerica, v. 1, n. 3, p. 288-292, 2015.
NASSANEY, M. S.; PYLE, K. The adoption of the bow and arrow in eastern North America: a view from central Arkansas. American Antiquity, v. 64, p. 243-263, 1999.
NIMUENDAJÚ, C. The Tucuna: habitat, history, and language. Washington: Smithsonian Institution, 1948.
NÚÑEZ, L. En torno a los propulsores prehispánicos del Norte de Chile. Boletín de la Universidad de Chile, v. 44, p. 4-8, 1963.
NÚÑEZ, L. Ocupación arcaica en la Puna de Atacama: secuencia, movilidad y cambio. In: MEGGERS, B. J. Prehistoria Sudamericana: Nuevas Perspectivas. Washington: Taraxacum, 1992. p. 283-307.
ODELL, G. H.; COWAN, F. Experiments with spears and arrows on animal targets. Journal of Field Archaeology, v. 13, p. 195-212, 1986.
OKUMURA, M.; ARAUJO, A. G. M. Long-term cultural stability in hunter-gatherers: a case study using traditional and geometric morphometric analysis of lithic stemmed bifacial points from Southern Brazil. Journal of Archaeological Science, v. 45, p. 59-71, 2014.
OWEN, B. Bows and spearthrowers in Southern Peru and Northern Chile: evidence, dating, and why it matters. 63rd Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Seattle, WA, 1998. Disponível em: <http://bruceowen.com/research/Owen1998-SAA-BowsAndSpearthrowersInSouthernPeruAndNorthernChile.pdf>. Acesso em: 16 jun. 2015.
PITT RIVERS, A. H. L.-F. The evolution of culture and other essays. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1906.
PRINS, H. E. L. The atlatl as combat weapon in 17th-century Amazonia: Tapuya Indian warriors in Dutch Colonial Brazil. The Atlatl, v. 23, p. 1-10, 2010.
PROUS, A. Arqueologia Brasileira. Brasília: Editora UnB, 1991a.
PROUS, A. Alimentação e “arte” rupestre: nota sobre alguns grafismos pré-históricos brasileiros. Revista de Arqueologia, v. 6, p. 1-15, 1991b.
PROUS, A.; BAETA, A. Elementos de cronologia, descrição de atributos e tipologia. Arquivos do Museu de História Natural da UFMG, v. XIII-XIV, p. 241-332, 1992-1993.
RATTO, N. Funcionalidad versus adscripción cultural: cabezales líticos de la margen norte del estrecho de Magallanes. In: LANATA, J. L.; BORRERO, L. A. Arqueología de cazadores-recolectores: límites, casos y aperturas. Buenos Aires: Arqueología Contemporánea 5, 1994. p. 105-120.
RAILEY, J. A. Reduced mobility or the bow and arrow? Another look at "expedient" technologies and sedentism. American Antiquity, v. 75, p. 259-286, 2010.
RAYMOND, A. Experiments in the function and performance of the weighted atlatl. World Archaeology, v. 18, p. 153-177, 1986.
REED, P. F., GEIB, P. R. Sedentism, social change, warfare, and the bow in the Ancient Pueblo Southwest. Evolutionary Anthropology, v. 22, p. 103-110, 2013.
RIBEIRO, P. A. M.; KLAMT, S. C.; BUCHAIM, J. J. S.; RIBEIRO, C. T. Levantamentos arqueológicos na encosta do planalto entre o Vale dos Rios Taquari e Caí, RS, Brasil. Revista do CEPA, Santa Cruz do Sul, v. 16, p. 49-89, 1989.
RIBEIRO, P. A. M.; RIBEIRO, C. T. Escavações arqueológicas no sítio RS-TQ-58: Montenegro, RS, Brasil. Série Documento (Editora da FURG), v. 10, p. 1-86, 1999.
RICKLIS, R. A. Toyah Components: evidence for occupation in the Project Area during the latter part of the Late prehistoric period. In: RICKLIS, R. A.; COLLINS, M. B. Archaic and Late Prehistoric Human Ecology in the Middle Onion Creek Valley, Hays County, Texas. Austin: Texas Archeological Research Laboratory, University of Texas at Austin, 1994. p. 207-316.
RIVERA, M. A. Una hipótesis sobre movimientos poblacionales altiplánicos en las costas del norte de Chile. Chungara (Revista de Antropología Chilena), v. 5, p. 7-31, 1975.
SCHALK, R. F.; OLSON, D. L. Archaeological testing of the prehistoric site at Lyons Ferry. In: SCHALK, R. F. et al. Cultural resource investigations for the Lyons Ferry Fish Hatchery Project, near Lyons Ferry. Pullman: Laboratory of Archaeology and History, Washington State University, Pullman Project Report No. 8, 1983. p. 141-178.
SCHMITZ, P. I. Sítio Pedro Fridolino Schmitz, Bom Princípio, RS. Número do Sítio RS 217. Anais do V Encontro do Núcleo Regional Sul da Sociedade de Arqueologia Brasileira – SAB/Sul, Rio Grande, RS. 2006. Disponível em: <http://www.anchietano.unisinos.br/sabsul/V%20-%20SABSul/simposio/atlantica/9.pdf>. Acesso em: 16 jun. 2015.
SHEA, J. J. The origins of lithic projectile point technology: evidence from Africa, the Levant, and Europe. Journal of Archaeological Science, v. 33, p. 823-846, 2006.
SHOTT, M. J. Spears, darts, and arrows: Late Woodland hunting techniques in the Upper Ohio Valley. American Antiquity, v. 58, p. 425-443, 1993.
SHOTT, M. J. Innovation and selection in prehistory: a case study from the American bottom. In: ODELL, G. H. Stone tools: theoretical insights into human prehistory. New York: Plenum Press, 1996. p. 279–309.
SHOTT, M. J. Stones and shafts redux: the metric discrimination of chipped-stone dart and arrow points. American Antiquity, v. 62, p. 86-101, 1997.
STEINEN, K. V. den. Entre os aborígenes do Brasil central. São Paulo: Departamento de Cultura, 1940.
STIRLING, M. W. Historical and ethnographical material on the Jivaro Indians. Washington: United States Government Printing Office, 1938. (Smithsonian Institution, Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 117).
SUÁREZ, R.; LÓPEZ, J. M. Archaeology of the Pleistocene-Holocene transition in Uruguay: an overview. Quaternary International, v. 109, p. 65-76, 2003.
SUÁREZ, R. Comments on South American Fishtail points: design, reduction sequences and function. Current Research in the Pleistocene, v. 23, p. 69-72, 2006.
SWANTON, J. R. A historic use of the spear-thrower in Southeastern North America. American Antiquity, v. 3, p. 356-358, 1938.
THOMAS, D. H. A Diegueño shaman's wand: an object lesson illustrating the "Heirloom Hypothesis". The Journal of California Anthropology, v. 3, p. 128-132, 1976.
THOMAS, D. H. Arrowheads and atlatl darts: how the stones got the shaft. American Antiquity, v. 43, p. 461-472, 1978.
TOMKA, S. A. The adoption of the bow and arrow: a model based on experimental performance characteristics. American Antiquity, v. 78, p. 553-569, 2013.
UHLE, M. Peruvian throwing sticks. American Anthropologist, v. 11, p. 624-627, 1909.
UHLE, M. Los aborígenes de Arica. Publicaciones del Museo de Etnología y Antropología de Chile, v. 1, p. 151-176, 1917.
UHLE, M. La arqueología de Arica y Tacna. Boletín de la Sociedad Ecuatoriana de Estudios Históricos Americanos, v. 3, p. 1-48, 1919.
UHLE, M. Fundamentos etnicos y arqueología de Arica y Tacna. Quito: Imprenta de la Universidad Central, 1922.
UHLE, M. Los aborígenes de Arica y el hombre americano. Chungara (Revista de Antropología Chilena), v. 3, p. 13-21, 1974.
VANPOOL, T. L. The survival of Archaic technology in an agricultural world: how the atlatl and dart endured in the North American Southwest. Kiva, v. 71, p. 429-452, 2006.
VIGNATI, M. A. El uso del propulsor en el noroeste argentino. Notas del Museo de la Plata, v. 1, p. 349-358, 1936.
WEBB, C. S.; McKINNEY, R. R. Mounds Plantation (16CD12), Caddo Parish, Louisiana. Louisiana Archaeology, v. 2, p. 39-127, 1975.
WEBSTER, D. The not so peaceful civilization: a review of Maya war. Journal of World Prehistory, v. 14, p. 65-119, 2000.
WEIDERHOLD, J. E.; SHAFFER, H. J.; PERRIN, D. A study of two ancient bows from Trans-Pecos Texas. Bulletin of the Texas Archaeological Society, v. 74, p. 89-101, 2003.
WESOLOWSKI, V. A prática da horticultura entre os construtores de sambaquis e acampamentos litorâneos da região da Baía de São Francisco, Santa Catarina: uma abordagem bio-antropológica. 2000. Dissertação (Mestrado) – Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2000.
WHITTAKER, J. C. Late survival of atlatls in the American Southwest?. The Atlatl, v. 20, n. 1, p. 10-12, 2007.
WHITTAKER, J. C. Weapon trials: the atlatl and experiments in hunting technology. In: FERGUSON, J. Designing experimental research in archaeology: examining technology through production and use. Boulder: University Press of Colorado, 2010. p. 195-224.
WHITTAKER, J. C. Comparing atlatls and bows accuracy and learning curve. Ethnoarchaeology, v. 5, p. 100-111, 2013.
WILBERT, J. The Warao Indians of the Orinoco Delta. In: WILBERT, J.; LAYRISSE, M. Demographic and biological studies of the Warao indians. Los Angeles: University of California, 1980. p. 3-9.
YERKES, R. W.; PECORA, A. M. The introduction of the bow and arrow. In: NIQUETTE, C. M.; HUGHES, M. A. Late Woodland archaeology at the Parkline Site (46PU99), Putnam County, West Virginia. Lexington: Cultural Resource Analysts, Inc., 1990. p. 95-106.
YOHE II, R. M. The introduction of the bow and arrow and lithic resource use at rose spring (CA-INY-372). Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology, v. 20, p. 26-52, 1998.
Os Cadernos do LEPAARQ publicam artigos em português, espanhol, italiano, francês e inglês, sem cobrança de nenhum tipo de taxa em nenhum momento, respeitando a naturalidade e o estilo dos autores. As provas finais serão enviadas aos autores, para sua conferência antes da publicação. O Conselho Editorial não se responsabiliza por opiniões emitidas pelos autores dos trabalhos publicados. O periódico Cadernos do LEPAARQ oferece acesso livre imediato ao seu conteúdo, seguindo o princípio de que disponibilizar gratuitamente o conhecimento científico ao público proporciona maior democratização mundial do conhecimento. Os textos publicados poderão ser depositados imediatamente pelos autores em suas páginas pessoais, redes sociais e repositórios de textos.Nesse sentido, o periódico não tem fins lucrativos, de modo que os direitos autorais dos artigos publicados pertencerão aos respectivos autores e estes não receberão nenhuma forma de remuneração. Dessa forma, ao enviar o artigo, o autor do mesmo estará automaticamente aceitando esta condição. A reimpressão, total ou parcial, dos trabalhos publicados deve ser apenas informada pelos seus respectivos autores ao conselho editorial do periódico. OBS. Cabe(m) ao(s) autor(es) as devidas autorizações de uso de imagens com direito autoral protegido (Lei nº 9610, de 19 de fevereiro de 1998), que se realizará com o aceite no ato do preenchimento da ficha de inscrição via web.
